Posted on 5-Dec-2011

Awesomenauts: 'PS3 isn't easy to work with, but Sony makes up for that'

Ronimo Games talk PSN, Zelda and gaming stigmas...

Ronimo Games might not be an immediately familiar name but the young studio has produced a number of excellent games in its short history, not the least of which are de Blob and Swords & Soldiers.

It's latest project; a PSN/XBLA-bound game titled Awesomenauts, is a call out to 16-bit gamers yearning for a bit of classic platforming-action with modern online multiplayer twist.

We had a chat with Jasper Koning, who is in charge of PR and marketing at Ronimo Games and co-founder Joost van Dongen about the upcoming game.

What's it like making a game for the PSN?

Awesomenauts Screenshot
Joost van Dongen: It's great, because it allows a small studio like us to get a game released worldwide on the major consoles. Sony are really supportive, and their technical support is really good. PS3 is not the easiest device to work with, and Sony really makes up for that by answering questions quickly.

What single innovation do you think would really change the games industry for the best?

JvD: It's not so much an innovation, but I think things would get a lot better if games were more accepted. There's still a vibe about them that they're only for nerds or fifteen year-old boys. In reality, almost everyone plays games these days, but in the West it still has that stigma. If games were taken as seriously as movies, that would be the biggest change.

Jasper Koning: When the Wii became successful, we hoped it would change the way people look at games. In the end it didn't really turn out, but we're still hoping that happens some day.

Awesomenauts is akin to the PC classic League of Legends, but for those not familiar with your inspiration, how would you describe your game?

JvD: Basically, it's a fast-paced 3v3 multiplayer game. It's a platforming game where you have to destroy the enemy base, and it's got a lot of tactical depth - and it's a lot of fun!

What's the most important videogame of all time?

JK I think I'll have to go with [Nintendo's] The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. When I first saw it I was totally blown away, and I realised that gaming would reach awesome heights in my lifetime. I was totally sure of that once I saw Ocarina.

Now that I think about it, I'm actually torn between that and Animal Crossing. That game has such a great sense of place - it really feels like it's an alternate reality.

JvD: I'd have to say Star Control 2. It's an old PC game that nobody seems to remember, but it had this really big, RPG-like universe. It also had something I've never seen in any game since: the universe is so big that you'd never be able to explore all of it. Even in huge games like Fallout 3 you can still visit every place on the map in about 100 hours, but not in Star Control. I absolutely love it.

Awesomenauts Screenshot
What's the worst thing about being a games developer?

JvD: Fixing bugs! [laughs]

JK: There's a lot of boring stuff, like the languages. Making sure everything gets translated properly. That's a really banal task, and it sucks.

JvD: Yeah, we don't have anyone at Ronimo who speaks English, Spanish and Italian... [laughs]. So we have to hire an external company to handle the localisation.

Are there any developers out there you think have done anything to move the games industry forward?

JvD I think Will Wright and Peter Molyneux. From Wright, games like The Sims and Spore, and from Molyneux, Theme Park and Black & White. What's cool about these games is that they do new things. Even if some of them don't work that well - Spore wasn't quite what people were expecting - they are still innovative. I think Wright and Molyneux are important developers when it comes to innovation and fleshing outthese ambitious ideas.

Order PSM3 here and have it delivered straight to your door

Recommended Links
From The Web

Comments

4 comments so far...

  1. Paranoimia on 5 Dec '11 said:

    You see, Bethesda? You only have to ask.

  2. gideonseer on 6 Dec '11 said:

    I'm all for a bit of classic platforming action. Sometimes I get fed up with the constant conveyor belt of first and third person shooters and RPG's. Its why I love Little Big Planet, takes you back to classic era but mega updated. Its why I love Limbo and even the bizarre Splosion Man!

    I think, with PS4, if there's one thing Sony MUST do its to make it easier to program for than PS3 has been. No doubt PS3 has power (Uncharted etc) but the consensus seems to be that the PS3 is considerably less developer friendly than the Xbox 360 and, given that people buy consoles on the basis of great games available, it should be as easy as possible for developers to make games for.

  3. jmslovatt on 6 Dec '11 said:

    Star Control! I'd totally forgotten that, thanks for reminding me!

  4. kirankara on 6 Dec '11 said:

    I'm all for a bit of classic platforming action. Sometimes I get fed up with the constant conveyor belt of first and third person shooters and RPG's. Its why I love Little Big Planet, takes you back to classic era but mega updated. Its why I love Limbo and even the bizarre Splosion Man!

    I think, with PS4, if there's one thing Sony MUST do its to make it easier to program for than PS3 has been. No doubt PS3 has power (Uncharted etc) but the consensus seems to be that the PS3 is considerably less developer friendly than the Xbox 360 and, given that people buy consoles on the basis of great games available, it should be as easy as possible for developers to make games for.

    Totally agree,I am from the nes/snes generation, so platforming was my staple dirt, and grew up on the best there was in genre, so miss them. Id hoped rayman would full void, but wasn't a fan of demo.
    Sony has already said it's next gen will be built with developers input , so think they've lesson there. They really did just get too big for boots, and needed 360 to bring them down to earth a bit. The success of PS and ps2 made them arrogant, and didn't heed warnings after ps2, which was also a b**ch to code for, thinking their market share guaranteed developers would get best out machine, but with success of 360, they got caught out, and developers really didn't have to waste time and effort programming for more difficult to program machine, as it initially had slow uptake