Medal of Honor Warfighter breaks cover

Laughlyn on 23 Feb '12 said:

"The sequel to the 2010 reboot is again being developed by Danger Close studios and follows the story of Tier 1 Operators"

Yeah, cos the last game was was SOOOOOOO good

djhazardous on 23 Feb '12 said:

Why is any of that a good thing? Both Medal of Honour's single & multi player were poor.

A dev like 'Danger Close' doesn't have what it takes. I bet they're a well small team and this release will just milk from Black Ops 2. Which is pathetic.

TheRandyNinja on 23 Feb '12 said:

sounds intresting. I enjoyed the single player more than the multiplayer. the multiplayer was a snipe fest the spawn killing was a joke, lets see what they can do given the chance.

Joe90_Remy700 on 23 Feb '12 said:

good stuff, danger close did a cracking sp in MoH, lets hope they right the wrongs of the multiplayer>>>

the multiplayer was a snipe fest the spawn killing was a joke, lets see what they can do given the chance.

MANYOO4EVA on 23 Feb '12 said:

Let me guess:

6 hour SP campaign

MP with same amount of maps and 1 extra mode - team deathmatch.

Ability to go prone and fly a jet/helicopter.

Wait... that was BF3 wasn't it?

Oh now I'm confused.

JD_Method on 23 Feb '12 said:

Let's give 'em a second chance then.

The first one was alright, but nothing spectacular. Here's hoping they can pull this one out of the bag.

Barry316 on 23 Feb '12 said:

I quite liked the single player in the last game. Sure it was scruffy, some levels obviously weren't finished and buggy but underneath it had a decent game trying to break out. Hopefully with more dev time they've sorted the issues out.

sened9 on 23 Feb '12 said:

Frostbite 2 means is going to feel like a 10 year old game that looks like s**t on consoles! I'm Sold

Fr33Kye on 23 Feb '12 said:

It doesn't need to be "good" or "original", whatever those words mean, in order to sell a significant amount.

1Nightmare1 on 23 Feb '12 said:

I think I'll stick with BF3.

TheLastDodo on 23 Feb '12 said:

Enjoyed the SP of the last MOH, gamebreaking bugs aside, more of the same would be appreciated, maybe add more variety in missions, let you customise your weapons Crysis style, more Tier 1 missions if they go in that direction again and obviously fix the gamebreaking bugs.

FixBeatGames on 23 Feb '12 said:

f**king yawn.

i'm so sick and tired of only really being able to find a decent number of players in online games if it's a bloody military shooter.

request for next gen: forget shooters exist. or at least just bloody let cod be the only one. then all the other devs can start giving us the games we really want (deep down, surely?)

Metatasian on 23 Feb '12 said:

Well, BF3 was s**t, maybe this will be better

KK-Headcharge78 on 23 Feb '12 said:

I liked the last MOH a lot, it had variation in gameplay style (love the sniping and chopper levels) It is perhaps like the Treyarch offerings within the EA military FPS triumverate but this ain't no bad thing and if people can't see the influences of MOH on BF3 then you must be blind. Looking forward to it.

As for the incessant whingeing about shooters, every one is entitled to their opinion so here's mine, shut the hell up and play something else. The genre exists because it has delivered some of the best games this gen; FACT, if you don't like these games tough s**t, millions do. If you don't like it kindly jog on and play some sports games, RPGs, platformers, racing games, puzzle games, fighting games, strategy games, casual games or open world games (yes these all still exist) and quit sounding like a broken f**king record. Of course I'd love to whinge like an old women at RPG's or something but then I'm too busy enjoying the game genres I know I like.

Either that or construct a decent, compelling argument....... god forbid.

sonic_uk on 23 Feb '12 said:

Yep, got a card inside my copy of Syndicate which arrived today which stated this. I really enjoyed the most recent Medal Of Honour game (spelt correctly for once in the ENGLISH grammar). It had a good story and was far superior to Cod in just about every way (well in Single Player mode anyway - I don't play Multiplayer). Cannot wait for a sequel.

toaplan on 23 Feb '12 said:

I thought they might be using the Frostbite 2 engine... I hope they will spend their energy on creating a really good single-player campaign. It's not so easy to improve on BF3's multiplayer, but it shouldn't be difficult to make a better single-player campaign.

FixBeatGames on 23 Feb '12 said:

I liked the last MOH a lot, it had variation in gameplay style (love the sniping and chopper levels) It is perhaps like the Treyarch offerings within the EA military FPS triumverate but this ain't no bad thing and if people can't see the influences of MOH on BF3 then you must be blind. Looking forward to it.

As for the incessant whingeing about shooters, every one is entitled to their opinion so here's mine, shut the hell up and play something else. The genre exists because it has delivered some of the best games this gen; FACT, if you don't like these games tough s**t, millions do. If you don't like it kindly jog on and play some sports games, RPGs, platformers, racing games, puzzle games, fighting games, strategy games, casual games or open world games (yes these all still exist) and quit sounding like a broken f**king record. Of course I'd love to whinge like an old women at RPG's or something but then I'm too busy enjoying the game genres I know I like.

Either that or construct a decent, compelling argument....... god forbid.

i did give a constructive reason for my hate of shooters this gen. they've taken over. even spilled into other genres and forces fps with 'x game' graphics splashed on it (see resi evil: operation racoon city).

people (me, for example) want to play a more varied game. you know the reason classic or 'retro' games remain so popular? because they're all so varied and different to each other. the main genre back then was platformers. but even most of those managed to feel quite different to each other!

and my constructive argument is; when i want to play say, little big planet 2 or wipeout hd or anything that isn't a shooter, it can often be hard to find a decent amount of people playing to provide the variation that cod's 1,000,000 every night provides.

i know that clearly indicated the public want to play shooters over anything else, but maybe, just maybe, that would change if more devs put more time and money into making something different, or at least defining a different genre this gen.

some amazing stuff HAS come out, but if it's online multiplayer, it suffers from everyone playing bloody cod instead syndrome! rayman, little big planet 2, wipeout hd, gran turismo 5, uncharted 3, dc universe, red dead redemption, they're all great games online, which could've all been better if more people played them!

anyway, people are going to moan. allow it imo

DJDIDO88 on 23 Feb '12 said:

must have

KK-Headcharge78 on 23 Feb '12 said:

Fair enough FixBeat, you provide a refreshing argument. There is indeed nothing worse than going online with a game to find there's no bugger to play with, I'm not sure banning FPS's is the answer, perhaps other genres need to step up their online offering (although I find it's more a case of time than numbers for games, i.e many games dry up online after 6-12 months)

ukdruid on 23 Feb '12 said:

Yep, got a card inside my copy of Syndicate which arrived today which stated this. I really enjoyed the most recent Medal Of Honour game (spelt correctly for once in the ENGLISH grammar). It had a good story and was far superior to Cod in just about every way (well in Single Player mode anyway - I don't play Multiplayer). Cannot wait for a sequel.

Oh please tell me you arnt serious? everything about MoH was so bad i almost cried, my absolute favorite WW2 games of yesteryear got such a crappy modern reboot, CoD's storys were far more entertaining, the only good thing about the MoH reboot were the sniping missions they actually were fun to do.

I would say let Dice have a crack at MoH 2 but after the diabolically bad BF3 campain i'd have to say no to that to.

FixBeatGames on 23 Feb '12 said:

yeah i think that's what i was trying to get at really. there can be a thousand fps's a year, that's fine, as long as the decent devs don't keep putting such massive majorities of their resources into JUST fps's, we could all be happy!

TheLastDodo on 23 Feb '12 said:

Think I'm tiring on the ol' military FPS now.

Personally I had more fun with Resistance 3, Crysis 2 and Bulletstorm than I did with BF3, MW3 and KK's GOTY Homefront

KMakawa on 23 Feb '12 said:

Why is any of that a good thing? Both Medal of Honour's single & multi player were poor.

A dev like 'Danger Close' doesn't have what it takes. I bet they're a well small team and this release will just milk from Black Ops 2. Which is pathetic.

1) Did you play the same Medal of Honor singleplayer as I did?
2) Do you know who Danger Close are? ..
3) On what basis do you think they don't have what it takes, if indeed.. you do know who they are?

HeKTiKzZ on 23 Feb '12 said:

is this where EA then say its a "CoD Beater" and then when it flops they say that BF4 is the CoD Beater?

casshern09 on 23 Feb '12 said:

good stuff, danger close did a cracking sp in MoH, lets hope they right the wrongs of the multiplayer>>>

the multiplayer was a snipe fest the spawn killing was a joke, lets see what they can do given the chance.

Mother of god. You thought the single player was good? Dear lord. I realise it's just a matter of opinion but man, it was friggin awful. I don't know how anyone could like it.

The Bossman on 23 Feb '12 said:

It has a LOT of work to do to get a sale from me, the first game was abysmally poor, dull and boring. I got a refund with a used online pass, presumably because they, Zavvi, felt pity on me for buying it. With any luck the new engine will breathe life into MOH once again.

KK-Headcharge78 on 24 Feb '12 said:

Think I'm tiring on the ol' military FPS now.

Personally I had more fun with Resistance 3, Crysis 2 and Bulletstorm than I did with BF3, MW3 and KK's GOTY Homefront

Hey hey any game with a review from Nut's magazine on the cover is an instant GOTY Get yourself an Xbox mate and you can add Gears of War to that list, Bulletstorm is deadly but Gears is like it's big blood covered brother.

KK-Headcharge78 on 24 Feb '12 said:

Why is any of that a good thing? Both Medal of Honour's single & multi player were poor.

A dev like 'Danger Close' doesn't have what it takes. I bet they're a well small team and this release will just milk from Black Ops 2. Which is pathetic.

1) Did you play the same Medal of Honor singleplayer as I did?
2) Do you know who Danger Close are? ..
3) On what basis do you think they don't have what it takes, if indeed.. you do know who they are?

This, Dangerclose are a bloody good dev.

biron_w on 24 Feb '12 said:

Anybody else get a feeling this will be released at the end of october? Maybe 2 weeks before the next COD?

dicky1993 on 24 Feb '12 said:

i enjoyed the first one, sunk hours into multiplayer, single player was ok, could have been better, more whinny people on here saying how they won't get it and having a go at everyone who will.

pathetic

illage2 on 24 Feb '12 said:

Despite all the "Hype" about the 2010 MoH, it wasn't that good, the graphics were not that great, and it's pacing was way too slow. The controls felt awkward, and the whole game was a buggy mess.

Ali_ on 24 Feb '12 said:

Thoroughly enjoyed the last one, to the extent that I went out of my way to get the platinum trophy. The SP was, IMHO, the best of its type and the only one to make you feel like a normal human being soldier rather than some kind of superhero/James Bond character. The last stand in the shattered house was one of the most affecting levels in any FPS I've played, as was the ending. That it was based on true events made it far more interesting, and tragic, as well.

MP should have had more work on it but it did have some interesting ideas and wasn't nearly as broken as some suggest. DICE just didn't seem to get round to finishing it. guess they had some other project going on...

TOKEN on 24 Feb '12 said:

EA has now become Activision,Black ops/Modern warfare to Battlefeild/medal of honour year after year release of nothing new.So long BF.

Imaduck on 24 Feb '12 said:

To do my part for consumer feedback, I got to admit that I'm personally all done with FPS "army dood" games for a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooog while. Even BF3 passed me by. I want to be excited, I think we've maybe just been spoilt

flyfletch on 24 Feb '12 said:

A dev like 'Danger Close' doesn't have what it takes. I bet they're a well small team and this release will just milk from Black Ops 2. Which is pathetic.

1) Did you play the same Medal of Honor singleplayer as I did?
2) Do you know who Danger Close are? ..
3) On what basis do you think they don't have what it takes, if indeed.. you do know who they are?

This, Dangerclose are a bloody good dev.

All i can say is, if your basing that on Medal Of Honour, then your wayyyy off the mark, it was abysmal, i was stupid enough to pre order and it was sent before i could cancel it when i got wind of the £39.99 i just spent on a steaming turd.

I used to love MOH, it had gone down hill anyway in the last few years, but they completely ruined it in my opinion... but everyone deserves a 2nd chance, but i wont be pre ordering this time...no way.....think ill wait for this to be reviewed.

Earthrod on 24 Feb '12 said:

But the most important issue is... Warfighter?!?!

Why not call it "Medal Of Honour: Gunshooter" if they're going for most stupid subtitle ever.

stevied on 24 Feb '12 said:

I think i speak for everyone here when i say "who gives a f**k"

In other news the ipad 3 is going to be released in March....all together now "WHO GIVES A FLYING f**k"

Paul_27 on 24 Feb '12 said:

ill give em a second chance and if the multiplayer is a failure i wont buy again from this games developer

TheLastDodo on 24 Feb '12 said:

I think i speak for everyone here when i say "who gives a f**k"

In other news the ipad 3 is going to be released in March....all together now "WHO GIVES A FLYING f**k"

No you spoke for yourself, if you spoke for me then you'd be interested in this.

EA has now become Activision,Black ops/Modern warfare to Battlefeild/medal of honour year after year release of nothing new.So long BF.

I guess you didn't play two of the finer games of last year, Bulletstorm & Shadows of the Damned, two new IP's and two EA games.

To become Activision you've got to only put out one game every year.

jm3811 on 24 Feb '12 said:

Afghanistan + Frostbite 2 + FPS = boycott.

gmcb007 on 24 Feb '12 said:

I think i speak for everyone here when i say "who gives a f**k"

In other news the ipad 3 is going to be released in March....all together now "WHO GIVES A FLYING f**k"

You speak for yourself.

I only played the SP due to EA's greedy online pass and I respect that they didn't go all michael bay just to impress the usual market but technically, it wasn't that well built for the time period it was released in.

dwhlufc on 24 Feb '12 said:

I felt quite indifferent about the first game once I'd finished it,I played it through on hard and thee was little to no challenge and I'm quite poor when it comes to FPS.I do however respect and enjoyed the fact that they did try to do it a little different,the setpieces were much more believable and quite good but overall the game did scream average especially with an unfinished online side to boot.

I hope they get it right this time and sort out all the issues from the first game,either way it will only be a rental for me this time.

sonic_uk on 24 Feb '12 said:

Yep, got a card inside my copy of Syndicate which arrived today which stated this. I really enjoyed the most recent Medal Of Honour game (spelt correctly for once in the ENGLISH grammar). It had a good story and was far superior to Cod in just about every way (well in Single Player mode anyway - I don't play Multiplayer). Cannot wait for a sequel.

Oh please tell me you arnt serious? everything about MoH was so bad i almost cried, my absolute favorite WW2 games of yesteryear got such a crappy modern reboot, CoD's storys were far more entertaining, the only good thing about the MoH reboot were the sniping missions they actually were fun to do.

I would say let Dice have a crack at MoH 2 but after the diabolically bad BF3 campain i'd have to say no to that to.

God forbid I like a game you dont.

BG88 on 24 Feb '12 said:

realy liked MOH the single player was brilliant i felt, aspecialy the mission where your a ranger and storm the mountain village then get over run at the end. I felt it got better and better as it went on but then the problem came it ended and i felt i had only played half a game. The multiplayer was fun at first but then people worked out the spawn spots got the motor fire and just smashed you to pieces. Im glad DC are doing the multiplayer side of it this time aswell.

aindriu80 on 24 Feb '12 said:

I think the single player was very logical and very rewarding, I preferred it to other games. The only downfall was moving around could have been a tad smoother and more flexible.

I hope they can get a better mulitplayer, I had real problems getting the fire controller trophy. It seemed a bit simple in terms of cover and manoeuvre.

Casssy on 24 Feb '12 said:

I don't think this will be any better....
Remember the good old day whit MoH on PSONE:)

EvilWaterman on 24 Feb '12 said:

I liked the last MOH a lot, it had variation in gameplay style (love the sniping and chopper levels) It is perhaps like the Treyarch offerings within the EA military FPS triumverate but this ain't no bad thing and if people can't see the influences of MOH on BF3 then you must be blind. Looking forward to it.

As for the incessant whingeing about shooters, every one is entitled to their opinion so here's mine, shut the hell up and play something else. The genre exists because it has delivered some of the best games this gen; FACT, if you don't like these games tough s**t, millions do. If you don't like it kindly jog on and play some sports games, RPGs, platformers, racing games, puzzle games, fighting games, strategy games, casual games or open world games (yes these all still exist) and quit sounding like a broken f**king record. Of course I'd love to whinge like an old women at RPG's or something but then I'm too busy enjoying the game genres I know I like.

Either that or construct a decent, compelling argument....... god forbid.

I couldn't have put it better myself!

madscar on 24 Feb '12 said:

I wonder if they really will try to do something fresh this time.. we can only hope.

xRamzz on 24 Feb '12 said:

I sure hope they'll man up and make the as good as the first ones, but we all know that ain't gonna happen. I'm sure we'll get a "free battlefield 3" key if we preorder

Azogstyle on 24 Feb '12 said:

I am very happy when i read this news. Well but i hope the gameplay will be longer than in Tier1. If it will be so good as the first one, i thing we got a first hot candidate for the game of the year

Mmmmgrolsch on 25 Feb '12 said:

Why is any of that a good thing? Both Medal of Honour's single & multi player were poor.

A dev like 'Danger Close' doesn't have what it takes. I bet they're a well small team and this release will just milk from Black Ops 2. Which is pathetic.

1) Did you play the same Medal of Honor singleplayer as I did?
2) Do you know who Danger Close are? ..
3) On what basis do you think they don't have what it takes, if indeed.. you do know who they are?

They made the last MoH aka one of the worst fps of this gen that I have played only beaten by Haze and Duke Nukem for the worst and close to BF3, it's no wonder djhazarous is sceptical.

flyfletch on 25 Feb '12 said:

I am very happy when i read this news. Well but i hope the gameplay will be longer than in Tier1. If it will be so good as the first one, i thing we got a first hot candidate for the game of the year

Oh dear....

Lurf on 25 Feb '12 said:

I'd like to see a medal of honor game in the WW setting like MOHAA was. A modern warfare type setting just is so much less appealing to me somehow. And I can hardly imagine MOH beating BF3.

Ploza on 25 Feb '12 said:

Think I'm tiring on the ol' military FPS now.

hixxy4 on 25 Feb '12 said:

Another fps that does not really do anything new. I hope im wrong and that anyone that gets it has great fun with it, but it's going to go up against Black ops 2. That's the reason they are making it.

carlos9 on 25 Feb '12 said:

The last game was disappointing, every level the same. The multi player was rubbish. COD lead the way !!!!!!

Pakamov on 26 Feb '12 said:

Really exited looking forward to it !!!

samih22 on 26 Feb '12 said:

am only buying this because am not supporting Activision anymore ...

samih22 on 26 Feb '12 said:

and I need somebody to shoot ...

rivalz on 26 Feb '12 said:

MOH... longtime that i wait nothing...

tudul on 26 Feb '12 said:

Looking forward to it !

TehSlenderMan on 26 Feb '12 said:

Lets see if this one will be as good as the first shall we? <.<

Xan764 on 26 Feb '12 said:

Trop déçu de la saga ...

Tiffosi on 27 Feb '12 said:

I guess i will stick around with BF3