Perhaps the gaming series that has coped with the development cycle problems best and done most for sandbox gameplay is Grand Theft Auto.
Launched in 1997 in a whirlwind of Max Clifford-generated controversy, the original developers DMA Design (who became Rockstar North) defined the free-roaming violent and vehicular action template with GTA.
"Up until that point, with very few exceptions, the game world was passive, or at least offered only minimal interaction with the player such as falling blocks, rising spikes or, if you were very lucky, swinging ropes," says Brian Baglow, CEO of Indoctrimat PR, who worked for DMA Design.
"GTA turned this on its head and made the player just another character in a whole world going about its daily business. The environment is not merely the setting for the action, but is an active part of the overall gameplay, which affects and reacts to the player as they progress."
In 2001, Grand Theft Auto III moved the series into 3D, becoming a true worldwide phenomenon in the process and spawning an entire genre of imitators from Just Cause to Saint's Row.
"It's frustrating though," adds Statham, "that if you consider GTA IV and the stuff they've crammed into Liberty City which allows for a phenomenal open-world gaming experience, that'll keep most gamers filled with wonderment for 100-plus hours, you still see comments on forums saying that graphically it's 'not up to much'.
"That kind of attitude is a real problem for open-world game developers because, whether we like it or not, looks sell games."
Armed Revolution
In 2008, there are a glut of freeform shooters on the horizon - Ubisoft's Africa-based sequel to Crytek's original, Far Cry 2, GSC Game World's STALKER prequel Clear Sky, Bethesda's Fallout 3 and Bohemia Interactive's Armed Assault 2 - and all these games are pushing the technology of open-world gaming into new territories.
In Armed Assault 2, for example, the development team is adding role-playing elements to the military simulator format, including a dynamic conversation system.
"If an NPC witnesses something in the game, even if it's something the gamer doesn't see themselves, then the NPC will remember," says Statham. "If, for example, an enemy squad moves through a town 20 miles from where the gamer is, the NPCs in the town will observe this.
"When you enter the town a couple of hours later, you can ask them if they've seen any enemy presence, and they'll tell you that they saw an enemy squad moving west about two hours ago - if they're friendly to you.
Perhaps they know that you killed a civilian in the next town across, so they won't tell you anything at all, or they'll lie to you to set you up for an ambush by the enemy..."
Ed del Castillo believes that improving AI is one of the most important areas for enhancing open-world gaming.
"The industry is talent-starved - we really need great coders and multi-dimensional people, as in order to have great AI, you need a person who can create systems that simulate life.
"That person needs to be someone introspective, philosophical, and a viewer of people - working out how to fake salient features in people."
Bethesda's Howard agrees: "I think it's become common for developers to be able to put lush scenery together, but creating other characters that can react to what you do in a believable and compelling way, is still very difficult. We have a long way to go."
Then of course, there are the MMOs - millions of individuals creating their own unique personalities, guilds and live events in huge, persistent game worlds. There are role-playing games including EverQuest II and the mighty World of Warcraft; community-driven racing games such as rFactor; MMO shooters including Tabula Rasa and the forthcoming Huxley; and the next generation of online urban adventures with APB, from Realtime Worlds, a company set up by Dave Jones, creative director of the original Grand Theft Auto.
Linear games are so last century - the future, it appears, is wide open. "We have the opportunity to show variety of choice, to let the player play the game he or she wants to play, and experience what they want to experience," says del Castillo. "The future of videogames isn't in storytelling, but in story-playing."
"That kind of attitude is a real problem for open-world game developers because, whether we like it or not, looks sell games."
Yeah, and GTA IV has sold how much?
I don't understand your point, it aint like he was slating it or anything and I'm sure he is well aware of how much it's sold, as we all are. What he said is true, looks do sell and the point he was making is that even with a great game like GTA there is still retarted people on forums that want to pick at it because it doesn't look like a FF cutscene.
I am glad the designers are starting to concentrate more on AI and freeform gameplay now rather than just graphical power. The quality of graphics has hit an amazing high right now, just look at the enviroments in crysis and far cry 2 and the art styles of bioshock and assassins creed for example, these graphics do more than enough to immerse the player and make them believe in what they are seeing, so i think the next logical step is in the AI department, to create the most realistic game possible you must have not just enviroments and characters that look real we need them to act realisticly too so i am very happy that they are hinting at advances in AI technology.
The games you mention are good examples but you are missing a great deal of games that were an inspiration for past and present games that not necessarily have to be "3D - free roaming" games.
Take for instance the Ultima series, in Ultima VII you have a huge world which you could travel using a variety of methods and for the porpoise of advancing the story, doing side quests or just looking for treasures, or even doing jobs for money that had nothing to do with the story (sound familiar?); and I'm sure that like this one there are many examples of games that revolutionized the way games are conceived but of course very few developers would be honest with their real source of inspiration (specially if their "inspiration" happens to be their competition).
I completely agree with 'humorguy' wise man indeed! Its more about how the game feels and reacts to you rather than whats looking at you! It would be alot nice to have really smart Ai opposed to highly detailed graphics's. Aka Crysis would of been unbelievable if they had spent more money on Ai, although its not to bad at this moment !
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited, Beauford Court, 30 Monmouth Street, Bath, UK BA1 2BW England and Wales company registration number 2008885