Like Star Trek films we've come to expect the Call of Duty games (if you take into account the ones released on consoles) to run one good, one bad.
However, now that former provenors of console-fare Treyarch have sat me down in front of the game, I've removed my cynicism goggles to look upon the series with fresh, blood-spattered eyes.
Dropping the number system, Call of Duty: World at War is a new start for the COD 3 developers - having been granted a lot more time to make the damn thing, and specialising on parts of the war not instantly recognisable to your average gamer - stuff like the Russian push on Berlin or, as I was recently shown, the conflict in the Pacific.
The raid of Makin Island, one of the first levels, starts with you tied to a chair, faced with a smug Japanese general.
He puffs cigar smoke in your face, before turning to one of your comrades and shouting appropriately phrased Japanese at him.
All standard fare until he takes that cigar and stubs it in your mate's eye, the blood-curdling scream making even fellow enemies squirm, before they move into full-blown shock when he slits your comrade's throat, spattering blood across the wall and the dead man's shadow.
As the general grabs you by the hair and readies to kill you, there's shouting, footsteps and a knife in your captor's back. A marine pulls you to your feet, assures you you're safe and shoves a gun into your hand, asking if you can fight.
As there isn't a "bugger this" option, you're well on your way into the most brutal portrayal of war you've ever seen.
The Other War
"We didn't want to make another World War II game. We wanted to make something new, something different," smiles Mark Lamia, Treyarch studio head.
"We knew with this Call of Duty that people didn't want to play the same WWII game, and we didn't want to make it - and we haven't."
The console skid-mark Medal Of Honor: Rising Sun and bog-standard FPS MOH: Pacific Assault portrayed this side of WWII as a rather linear journey against some angry-looking Asians on a glorious summer holiday, but WAW continues COD's tradition of action-packed gameplay rooted in historic conflict - and the reality of a situation that was blood-drenched and ugly as sin.
Both in our history lessons and in most WWII games there's a heavy focus on classical tank and infantry combat, with familiar soldiers and countryside dotting a stretch of countryside.
Here, we see a rich, pine-laden Pacific and a different war, thanks to the unconventional style of warfare use by the Japanese.
While the banzai tactic of running, swords drawn, into the enemy is well-known, the Japanese fought in a brutal, mano a mano fashion.
The Bushido code, which valued honour over life, drove Japanese soldiers to fight to their last breath, no matter how dire and hopeless the situation was. To put it in Lamia's words, "They were taking no quarter, and none was given."
"COD has always been about authentic and cinematic battles," he continues, "and as we learned about this enemy, we knew we had to change the game we were making.
The Imperial Japanese weren't like any modern fighting force you've ever seen. They were a gritty, ruthless, non-traditional opponent - stuff like guerrilla warfare and the Bushido code were completely alien to the Americans at the time."
Japanese soldiers would hide in undergrowth and slit the throats of sleeping soldiers and snipe from trees, using every trick they could to bewilder the allies.
I later witness this in-game, near the end of the Makin Raid, as we trundle past a seemingly benign set of bushes.
Flashlights suddenly blind us and a bunch of manic Japanese soldiers leap from the foliage. One primes a grenade and grabs a soldier in a suicidal embrace, winning a grim victory.
World at War's stated aim is to move away from convention, removing the stodge from a tired genre with new vistas, under-exposed theatres of war, and a new angle on storytelling.
As such, London-based video maestros Spov, best-known for their excellent mission briefings from COD4, have returned to the franchise to create WAW's campaign FMVs.
They go beyond the simple briefing format with amazing combinations of slick graphics and facts about the mission you're sent on.
The Makin Raid mission is pre-empted by giant floating ribbons, an introduction to Emperor Hirohito and a visual representation of Japan's invasion of Asia, with historic footage mixed in for good measure.
It's a fascinating mix of Bond-style credits and stock footage that gives meaning to the action as well as the necessary pep and excitement.
Extra Time
Treyarch have had two years to create WAW, and Lamia is proud to say they've used it well: "We've created something that's a great deal edgier, and with that edge the whole thing feels different. WAW will feel nothing like any other WWII game you've ever played."
And behind the optimistic waffle, he could be right - while we're used to slow-paced crawls that eventually lead to hiding in ruined houses and bunkers, with the occasional tank thrown in, the Makin Raid appears to be pulse-pounding, erratic and wildly disorienting.
Enemies seem to come from everywhere and nowhere, sneaking through undergrowth before charging at you, or hiding in seemingly cleared areas, waiting for you to pass by.
"We've found, thanks to the AI, that testers are naturally using the tactics soldiers worked with," interjects Noah Heller, the game's senior producer.
"Like throwing grenades into empty bunkers just in case there's a soldier waiting to jump you at the next opportunity. It's all pretty amazing."
Four Man Army
New to the series is the four-player co-op mode, allowing you and your friends to waltz through WAW's conflicts, dropping in and out at the beginning of levels.
I am given a demonstration of just how effective this is when the action skips to covering an encounter with a huge armoured division on some exotic-looking farmland.
With two players on hand, one takes on the tank battalions by ducking into foxholes and launching barrages of rockets, then by going hell-for-leather and leaping on top of them, dropping a grenade casually into the metal beasts before scarpering.
Meanwhile the other player covers him and handles the infantry, at one point using a flamethrower (see Flame On! box out) to set fire to a huge field of corn, scorching several ghillie-suited Japanese soldiers and grimacing at their pained screams.
The blowtorch certainly has a Return to Castle Wolfenstein feel (understandable, as many of the staff from Gray Matter - RTCW's developer - are now working at Treyarch), but now has more practical uses in its ability to set fire to trees and any hidden snipers, as well as spreading between soldiers that are touching or are too close to each other.
Moving on from the farmland, the pair hurry up a hill and face a group of soldiers holed up in a building, using a handheld mortar to flush them out.
Said building, being of a destructible ilk, is shattered, and the explosion throws two worried-looking Japanese soldiers arse-over-tit accompanied by a pile of physics-enabled rubble. Not a pleasant end.
No time for a breather though as seconds later a low-flying plane screams through player two's vision, snapping power cables and crashing in a wall of flames that engulfs a passing tank.
You couldn't imagine a scene that sings from the COD hymn sheet with as much gusto.
Dizzying Heights
These days it's become corny to even say that WWII is a road that has been heavily-trod previously - it's something that everyone says and everyone thinks.
However, the COD4 engine, along with the new environment, has led Treyarch to believe they are creating a genuinely exhilarating experience out of source material thought long-since bled dry.
"My hope is that players reading about this will realise that you're not going back to WWII - you haven't been here before.
That's how we're making this game. It's a realistic, true-to-events game that we're taking in a direction that no-one's ever seen," grins Lamia.
Heller steps away from the controls and nods. "When we chose the name 'World at War,' we wanted to make it clear that this was WWII and that we were going to re-establish the genre much like COD4 did. Infinity Ward set a high bar, and we're going to set the same bar for WWII gaming."
Another help is that they're using the multiplayer from Call of Duty 4, right down to the matchmaking and the excellent levelling-up system that makes playing COD4 online so engrossing.
WAW also has a new attachments system, allowing guns to be realistically modified (eg bipods can be connected to machine guns, letting you to lean the gun on a wall to make an accurate turret).
Players will also have dedicated vehicle-based games, including some in specially made vehicle-only combat zones.
Treyarch are promising great things, but they're keeping schtum about them for now. Rumour is that you'll be able to use the LVT - an amphibious transport vehicle - to sneak up on people from the water.
Friend Zone
Multiplayer-wise PC gamers will be treated to 32-player free-for-all battles (much larger than on World at War's console versions).
That means, with the promised dedication to mappers and modders, we can expect some epic combat scenarios. Also new to the multiplayer is the cross-map squad feature.
Rather than just letting players stick together, you can now have built-in squad benefits - we predict better accuracy will be one example - that work across the team.
These are still a work-in-progress, but promise to reward players for sticking together through Team Deathmatch, Capture the Flag, Vehicle Deathmatch and other returning modes.
They may also lead to some interesting clan-based scenarios, with particular load-outs leading to monumental clashes.
Duty Calls
The maps have all been forged using readily available tools and have been tested and tweaked since development began, allowing Treyarch time to create convincing line battles, fast-paced fights (so that you're no more than five seconds from a fight at any given point) and some individual and interesting maps for the multiplayer modes.
I watched a game played by a group of testers. The play was every inch as action-packed as a COD4 game, with one player shooting through a hut wall and leaping through the hole to escape a grenade, while others joined in a pitched battle that appeared far more fast-paced than earlier WWII notches on the Call of Duty bedpost.
It isn't all Pacific either, Treyarch are still to reveal the European campaign - the Road to Berlin - where you are part of the Russian advance.
This part of the war, previously only covered in depth by strategy titles, saw embittered Russian forces pushing the Nazi forces back into their home country and on to Berlin.
Here the Third Reich's army fought a street-by-street battle to slow down the Red Army's advance, in a bid to give civilians a chance to escape the brutal vengeance of the Soviets.
I went into Treyarch's offices cynical, and came out cautiously excited. Call of Duty: World at War looks truly different.
While it's still a World War II FPS, it has new enemies that react differently and, as Treyarch and their war researchers repeatedly say, entirely different battles.
Sure, we've been burnt by this sort of thing before with the mediocrity of Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault, but even in EA's botched effort there were moments in which the variety, spectacle and terrifying 'trees have eyes' tension as you snuck through the undergrowth, gave us something new.
What is remarkable is that despite the preponderence of action games set in World War II, the bits we're all-too familiar with remain the thin-end of a particularly horrifying global wedge.
The day people truly run out of things to say about the conflict, or ways to portray it, will be the day that it's revealed that historians haven't been working hard enough.
Say "It's not Infinity Ward!" all you want, but let down some of your defences as Call of Duty: World at War could be massive.
I still can't see why sohuld this not be a great game. Let's give it a chance, perhaps they won't screw up another possibility to build a top game: let's face it, co-op multiplayer and WW2 is something we all like if it's well done.
Well i know for one that i will be giving this a chance. COD4 is sooo good that Treyarch would be fools to not assimilate some of the best points about it into their game. And at any rate, a different battlefield from WW2 is at least TRYING to give us something new. Just because COD4 was so good doesn't mean that all WW2 are now rubbish by default.
I'm quietly confident about this game. I'll certainly download a demo if there is one to try before I buy. Hopefully the multiplayer side is good, because that's the main reason why I bought Call of Duty 4.
"As there isn't a "bugger this" option..."
I could have used that option in quite a few games I tell thee.
Just watched the trailer on xbox live and it does look pretty good. A demo would be good though...especially if its got a online element to the demo as well.
They need to sort out the prestige mode. Giving someone a shiny medal for playing solidly for 6 months just isn't right. A better way to judge someones worth would be to rank them on their kill to death ratio. That would seperate the men from the boys.
Also, why not try Vietnam or Korea? Surely they would not have caused such a technological step backwards from COD4?
If we consider that our universe may be just one of an infinite number, as some scientists hypothesise, then imagine if you could gather every last particle of meh from all of the universes combined and condense them down into a single three letter word, it would still not be enough for this game.
Just watched the trailer on XBL and it looks friggin awesome.
Yeah, it might be a WWII game but its going to be using the COD4 engine and they also seem to have been given more time to develop the game than they did the last time, so come on Haters, give it a chance, it may even surprise you.
I think the moral issues would quickly overshadow any succesful inclusion of an axis campaign. However, other excellent games such as Company of Heroes pulled it off very well. I would be concerned that a game as massive as Call Of Duty would attract damaging press should the axis history be covered. Not that this has bothered Grand Theft Auto, but GTA4 was a stinker, in my opinion. I think the main point is that people are admittedly tired of WW2 shooters. I would like to see Korea and Vietnam covered. I will be interested to see how multiplayer is affected, seeing as it will be using the same engine. No more UAV recon? No helicopters in 1945 either. I can imagine that you will be able to call in airstrikes from fighter bombers and zeros, and offshore artillery is both believable an historically accurate. I'm sure it will work, but I still want to see a ranking/prestige system based on Kill To Death ratio, rather than time spent in the game. Surely then you would know if you're fighting crack players and clans. I'm new here, this is just an idea.
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited, Beauford Court, 30 Monmouth Street, Bath, UK BA1 2BW England and Wales company registration number 2008885
