Working out where to start with Fallout 3 is almost as bewildering as the unparalleled sense of disorientation we experienced when we first stumbled, bedazzled, half-blinded and guilt-ridden (Why? Our lips remain sealed) from the depths of Vault 101. We're currently precariously juggling more info in our skulls than that last minute A-level cramming session - and working out what exactly constitutes a spoiler (or not) is driving us barmy. So bear with us as we attempt to explain why you absolutely have to buy Fallout 3, even if it hasn't quite topped Bethesda's opus, Oblivion.
Ah yes, Oblivion. See, it's going to be impossible to review Fallout 3 without constantly, infuriatingly having to refer back to those bloody Elder Scrolls. And that's a pity, because Bethesda are to be applauded for embracing the Fallout universe with such zealous alacrity, producing possibly the most fully-realised, borderline obsessive homage to another developer's title ever seen. Yet, who apart from the hardest of the PC hardcore will even have heard, let alone played, the series before now? The irony is this is exactly how gamers should view the title - as a genuine sequel to Fallouts 1 & 2 - and not a post-apocalyptic Oblivion. But, in the end, comparisons are inevitable.
To arms then. For starters, Fallout 3's Capital Wasteland is a considerably smaller, albeit denser, environment than Cyrodiil. As for the main quest itself, we're talking proper short - in head-down slogging mode we caned it within a paltry nine hours. It gets worse - unlike Oblivion, once finished the game ENDS FOR GOOD - a real step backwards in our humble opinion. Worse still, it's not until the closing stages that you're really gripped by the seismic events overtaking DC. We know perfectly well that that's not the way you're meant to play the game, but we'd be lying if we said we weren't ever so slightly disappointed. Worse still, we're totally mystified as to the complete lack of any guild-style quests in the game - especially when the various factions (Brotherhood of Steel, Enclave, Raiders, Slavers) surely offered every bit as much questing potential as Cyrodiil's Thieves, Mages and Fighters' guilds.
Obviously, actually approaching Fallout with such single-minded intentions would be doing a disservice to Bethesda. The bleak Capital Wasteland lies before you, just begging to be explored, and - like Oblivion before it - it's often those quests that you'll stumble upon off the beaten track that end up being the most rewarding. How else would you get to reaffix Abe Lincoln's bearded bonce onto his famed memorial, rescue an android who's become self-aware from termination, attach a satellite array to the top of the Washington Monument, battle a couple of self-styled faux superheroes or defend the freaky folk of DC from a colony of giant mutated fire ants?
Initial character creation is visually guff, but building your personality is something else. The 'You're SPECIAL' book you're given by Pops as a toddler and G.O.A.T test you sit when you're a teen are inspired, while some of the perks you'll accumulate during your adventure are touched by genius. Yet even at the dizzying heights of level 17 (the cap is 20), we never felt rich, overpowered or truly comfortable - and the sight of a Yao Guai or Deathclaw galloping across the badlands on a collision course with our throat still chills to the bone. Being a penny-pinching, post-apocalyptic perpetual pauper might be realistic, but it can also be frustrating; specifically the marked absence of any Microfusion Cells to power our laser rifle (after ploughing all our skill points into energy weapons) rankled massively, leaving us to resort to our crappy SMG and police baton. We can almost hear the Super Mutant Masters chuckling in anticipation as we write.
Given that combat was possibly Oblivion's weakest suite, we're pleased to report that the shooty shooty mechanics are - while obviously not up to the standards of 360's top notch FPS' - pretty sterling in the main. However, it's V.A.T.S. (Vault-Tec Assisted Targeting System) where killing is transformed from a spiffing lark into a bona fide art form - especially when you get your hands on the Bloody Mess perk. The sense of satisfaction gleaned when popping the head clean off a molerat from fully 100 yards, watching a sole eyeball ping out of a ne'er-do-well raider's skull in slow motion or frazzling a Super Mutant into a pile of steaming ash is not to be under-estimated. It also adds some neat strategy to battles; for instance, zapping the control inhibitor on a Robobrain will cause it to go berserk, attacking foes and friends alike.
Fallout 3 boasts some truly incredible moments, the majority of which we wouldn't want to spoil for you. Saying that, our first encounter with a Super Mutant Behemoth - unleashing the full force of the Fat Man nuke launcher into its growling mug and watching the mini mushroom cloud that ensues - is worth a shout. Or detonating the (now infamous) bomb that the village of Megaton has somewhat unwisely been constructed around from Tenpenny Tower and feeling the nuclear wind ruffle through your hair. There are also far less grandiose, more subtly unsettling instances though. Like when you stumble upon a faint distress signal, carefully track it back to its source only to find the long-dead skeletons of the family you were hoping to rescue. Or the unsettling, sadistic hallucinogenic flashbacks you suffer upon delving into the depths of Vault 106. It's genuinely chilling, thought provoking stuff.
Despite the obvious highlights, Fallout 3 also seems strangely lacking in those manifold 'whoa' moments than Oblivion threw at you with such abandon. It's in part due to the relentless bleakness of the post-apocalyptic setting itself. Although technically head and shoulders above Oblivion (Draw distance issues? Not any more), it's obviously not as naturally aesthetically pleasing, and the irradiated landscape offers little scope for variation. There's also little in the way of environmental effects; surprising and disappointing considering how well radioactive storms were handled on the PC's S.T.A.L.K.E.R. That said, the combat frequently looks irresistibly beautiful; especially those blurrily slow-mo VATS takedowns.
The much-vaunted vaults also left us curiously unenthused. Although the fallout shelters you'll visit during the course of the main quest (namely 112 and 87) are superbly executed, others feel like rubbishy dungeons - with no real payoff for slogging through to their inner sanctums. The word that leaps to mind is 'unfinished' or, rather - like GTA IV before it - maybe some of the most scrummy morsels are being quite deliberately held back for future (inevitable) expansions. If, as we suspect, that turns out to be true, we can't help but feel it's a bit naughty.
But maybe the relentless hype machine meant we simply expected too much from the Capital Wastelands. In almost all respects, Fallout 3 is a staggering, genre-defining achievement - marrying an utterly immersive world, memorable characters, incredible production values, some of the most inspired RPG mechanics ever devised and so much heart. It might not steamroll the epic Oblivion in the manner we all hoped, but maybe that was simply asking too much. Instead, Fallout 3 stands as the perfect companion piece - a near unparalleled RPG that stands so far ahead of the majority of the games on 360 that it would be a crime against gaming not to laud this title as anything other than a masterpiece. But perhaps the biggest single complement we can pay Fallout 3 is that it sits proudly alongside its cult PC brethren as an (almost) equal. For that reason alone, it joins the pantheon of 360 Must Buys.
Rob Taylor
// Overview
Verdict
Gob-smacking yet curiously a little underwhelming as well, it's still a landmark RPG.
Uppers
Amazing authentic gameworld VATS system works brilliantly
There sure is a lot of negative things to say about it, judging from your review. That character means, there has to be a LOT more and better things to it... I don't get that feeling.
I like how you comment on the areas you think lack something, but I don't, based on the review, get a feeling this is a 9.3 game?
Ill pick up Fallout 3, just not Day 1. There are too many games out at the moment that I think I can just pick up and play, to me Fallout is the opposite kind of game where you need to dedicate serious time to get the most out of it.
Good review, great score and a deffo purchase, you folks will just have to tell me how good it is without giving away too many spoilers.
I have been watching a lot of gameplay videos and there is one thing worrying me. The VATS system. It looks fun to start with but I can see myself getting very annoyed with it cos it's so slow. I think I'm gonna rent this one first.
I never got into Oblivion. It was just TOO freeform and it felt really aimless. The landscapes were nice for a while, but I couldn't play more than a few hours of it before I got bored.
I'm really interested in this one, but I worry that it's going to be just the same in terms of not having a specific goal to work towards. Anyone who can put my mind at ease would be good. Otherwise I'll get back to waiting for Gears 2 and L4D
arr i was so sure that i was going to buy this friday but now i dont know...
i mean i only have enough money to buy one game until next month and my parents are away all weekend so im gonna sit and play on our brand new 52" tv all weekend but now im not sure which i should buy, this or fable?
it sounds fantastic but i still havent completed the main quest of oblivion (even though ive played that for like 50 hours +) so dunno whether i should just buy fable 2 and get my fallout fix by playing oblivion in between or just buy fallout and forget to go to work monday....
Hmm, not exactly a glowing review - certainly less positive than I expected, not to mention less positive than the 9.3 score would indicate.
I loved Oblivion. My one main gripe with it was that it was another fantasy RPG. With Fallout 3 fixing this flaw, is it conceivable that I'll prefer it? Who cares if the main quest is only 9 hours? Who actually plays these games and ignores the side quests????
What a useless review. Why give something a 9.3 then spend most of the page pointing out its flaws.
And while we're on the subject of reviews, make them longer then you can list negatives and positives. IGN has 3,4,5 page reviews (alot are still useless reviews, but at least you get a better idea).
I agree with dajmin, might be GoW2, L4D and BK for me. I think a short single player and no multiplayer may have made my mind up. Will probably be a trade in purchase. Had there not been so many games, I would've got it though!
Can someone clear this up, the combat isnt turn based is it?
Nah, you can fight just like you did in Oblivion, sorta FPS-esque. On top of that, you have a computer assisted targeting system, that lets you aim at specific body parts and multiple enemies to string together attacks. The percentages to hit those parts are shown too, so you can weigh up the risk vs reward.
This I have garnered from reading/seeing stuff, I have no experience of it myself.
Can someone clear this up, the combat isnt turn based is it?
Nah, you can fight just like you did in Oblivion, sorta FPS-esque. On top of that, you have a computer assisted targeting system, that lets you aim at specific body parts and multiple enemies to string together attacks. The percentages to hit those parts are shown too, so you can weigh up the risk vs reward.
This I have garnered from reading/seeing stuff, I have no experience of it myself.
excellent! think its gonna be one for chrimbo. Ive never played oblivion but only hear good about it. Sounds like a good idea but surely you wouldnt wanna analyse every single opponent that comes near you.
really looking forward to it although CVG give no reasons to buy it in their 9.3 review "yeah the games fcking awsome guys but heres all the sh*t things"
Oblivion was an amazing game i even bought the DLC too! if Fallout 3 cant top Oblivion then its a waste of time really, Gears of War 2 should hit the streets soon thats the game everyones waiting for, i cant wait
LOL After reading the first paragraphs i actually thought that score was a misprint. Im a little annoyed at the fact you whizzed through the game.Whats the point in that?An RPG is about being apart of an experience,not tearing through the main story in under 10 hours.IGN said the game would take 20 hours to complete but well over 100 to see everything.Well,it took me 150+ hours to see almost everything in Oblivion so 100+ hours is fine in my books.
You say at the beginning of your feature that you are having trouble 'working out what exactly constitutes a spoiler'
Well.... let me help you out there:
'Like when you stumble upon a faint distress signal, carefully track it back to its source only to find the long-dead skeletons of the family you were hoping to rescue'
This mate, constitutes a spoiler... and a bloody big one. And that ain't the only one in this 'revealing' review!!. Now the moment I come across aforementioned faint distress signal sent by a 'family', I'll know exactly what lies at the end of that quest. Thanks so much, you complete and utter &**%wit!
Could you please be more critical when it comes to reviews on AAA titles like Fallout 3? Seriously, the line-up this winter is soo awesome, I'm really having trouble deciding what to get and when. Do I get this now or in November? Is it a must have on pain of death or a must have on pain of wallet? C'mon!
No doubt you steamed through the game to make this review, but i think you should now go back and play the side quests. Then write another review about whether it should be compared, or treated as a whole new Fallout series (i hope ).
i was positive Fallout would get great scores across the board. i've been following it for ages and i'm looking forward to getting my hands on that tin lunchbox on thursday. FO3, GOW2 and Dead Space are the absolute best this winter in my opinion.
Oblivion was an amazing game i even bought the DLC too! if Fallout 3 cant top Oblivion then its a waste of time really
Hardly. If everyone had that attitude we'd have nothing to play from one year to the next. Besides, Fallout 3 is a different game to Oblivion. Elder Scrolls V, now that should top Oblivion.
Gears of War 2 should hit the streets soon thats the game everyones waiting for, i cant wait
EVERYONE'S waiting for? Hmm... Not me. There are many other games I'm waiting for more than this. Fallout 3 being one of them.
gotta say decent score yet one of the worst reviews I've read for the game not enough focusing on the positives and why is oblivion better? This has better voice acting, better draw distance and probably graphics too and a denser world sure oblivion was massive but most of it was just hill after hill seperated by a town or dungeon here and there with monsters that leveled with you so no need for leveling and rubbish attacks, surely fallout 3 must be better!
I've pre-ordered it but I'm actually getting it for my Christmas so I won't be able to play it until then. Still good and points to it like most games now a days, and at least I can't compare it to Oblivion, as I've never played it.
Does it have the mood of the old Fallout games? I never played them, but I have lots of friends who love them - and the intro Sinatra-song from one of them is stuck in my mind because of Fallout's menu that was running on a PC in the store I worked in at the time.
Oblivion better? Perhaps Oblivion scored well on the Xbox, but I bought it on PC, and was fed up with it after a few sessions. Repetitive and slow-paced. Eye of the Beholder I and II we're terrifying (in the good way) to play. Oblivion was badly put together, and frustrating.
I'll go look for a PC-review, but after hearing "Oblivion was better" then I'm probably just going to pass this up.
FarCry2 just dropped the ball on making a *world* for us to play in, despite it's many charms. I'm afraid FO3 has been "arcaded" (or "dumbed down" for the console generations as well. I'm going to pass this one by.
I wasn't going to pick this up straight away as I have both condemned 2 (ps3) (got it for Ł10 the other week, not bad) and far cry 2 on pc to play. But I was in sainsburys and they had the 360 version for Ł29. The ps3 version was Ł34 btw. So I picked up a copy for 360. Bargin.
Enormously surprised at the negative Oblivion comparisons. For me, it stands head and shoulders above Beth's previous work. Fallout is pacier and more focused, which I suppose will disappoint some, but for me it's quite an achievement. The incredible scope is still there - you just have to search for it a little more. It rewards diversion really well.
And then there's the always-tense atmosphere, which just elevates it even higher. It brought to mind System Shock 2 on numerous occasions, particularly one section late-on. Being genuinely spooky and suspenseful contrasts beautifully with Oblivion.
For comparison, this. I found it truly mesmerising from start to finish and through again, by some stretch game of the year, and one of the most exciting things I've played since - goodness! - Half-Life 2.
Just buy the mag for a full review guys! Anyway looks like I'm going to score some more achievements. Got a 1000 points in Oblivion. But the time, playing Fable right now.
i have 1 question,if oblivion was so better.why did u guys give it a 9.0 & fallout 3 a 9.3? also,have u heard of a spoiler alert? u get a 4.5 for your review buddy!
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited, Beauford Court, 30 Monmouth Street, Bath, UK BA1 2BW England and Wales company registration number 2008885