Login to access exclusive gaming content, win competition prizes
and post on our forums. Don't have an account? Create one now!
Why should you join?
Click here for full benefits!
Follow our Twitter feedActivision ditches PS3 from Black Ops ads - http://bit.ly/ciV7fr
SIGN IN/JOIN UP
GamesForumsCheatsStore
First Mega Man Universe gameplay reveals 'Megafied' Ryu | CryEngine gets stereoscopic 3D support | Castlevania Lords of Shadow inspired by Star Trek | Activision ditches PS3 from Black Ops ads | Sexy new Killzone 3 screens are in | New violent Activision racing game uncovered | Sony: 3D 'best on a big screen' | Devil May Cry 5 will have western touch - Inafune | What does Activision think about Medal Of Honor? | CoD: Black Ops Killstreak rewards revealed | What's 2010's best portable game? | Remedy chats Alan Wake 2 | Blu-ray capacity will 'grow with games industry's ambition' | Back to the Future video game gets Doc | LucasArts 'massacres' staff headcount | Metroid: Other M gameplay shows insect problem | Spider-Man: Shattered Dimensions trailer swings in | Ubisoft teases something grim | Motion control 'won't be mainstream for 10 years' - Mikami | Yakuza 4 trailer punches in | Black Ops 'can match MW2' - Activision | Open Source PS3 hack video emerges | Epic making 'Fable for iPhone' - video | Super Mario Collection Pack coming to Japan next month | Metal Gear Solid 4 trophy support unlikely - Kojima
All|PC|PlayStation|Xbox|Nintendo|Download PC Games
Search CVG
Computer And Video Games - The latest gaming news, reviews, previews & movies
Join CVG on Facebook!
CVG Home » News
PreviousMAG beta key giveaway Just Cause 2 release date confirmed  Next

Far Cry 3 looking "pretty exciting"

Scriptwriter confirms third game is in development
Submit Article To N4G  Submit Article To Reddit  Submit Article To del.icio.us  Submit Article To Digg
Far Cry 3 is in development and looking "pretty exciting", an Ubisoft scriptwriter has told Official PlayStation Magazine.

Speaking at a recent Avatar junket, OPM asked Ubisoft scribe Kevin Shortt if he was working on a third Far Cry title and instead of the usual "no comment", the mag received a refreshing response...

"No I'm not," he replied honestly. "But I know the team are and what I've seen looks pretty exciting." Far Cry 3 confirmed then, just like that.

Other than that blatant response, it's mostly guess work so far on what we should expect from Far Cry 3. Last year though narrative designer Patrick Redding did mention that a sequel would likely retain an African setting, though he also mentioned Antarctica as a possibility.

It's also probable the third game will be based around an improved version of the Dunia engine, OPM points out, which was specifically built to handle complex real-world physics within a sandbox environment.

We've contacted Ubisoft for comment.

Buy your copy of Official PlayStation Magazine and have it delivered to your door.

computerandvideogames.com
// Interactive
               
 
Read all 69 commentsPost a Comment
Far Cry 3 looking "pretty exciting"

That's good because Far Cry 2 was bloody boring.
wrightandrewjame on 24 Nov '09
was all geared up for far cry 2... till i played it.

god that game was shit.
svd_grasshopper on 24 Nov '09
FC2 is brilliant if you put in the effort.
spaceman_DOUG on 24 Nov '09
FC2 is brilliant if you put in the effort.

Games shouldn't take "effort". They should be fun. Far Cry 2 was far too much work. Drive here. Kill him. Drive all the way across Africa. Oops I have Malaria. Take tablet. Kill these guys at a road block. Go to objective. Kill guy. Go back down same road. Oh the roadblock is repopulated. Get back to town. Rinse and repeat for 15 hours.
wrightandrewjame on 24 Nov '09
I hope Far Cry 3 has better controls than 2. All they need do is copy the control feel of Left4Dead, Halo or Modern Warfare. I loved the last game but gave up very quickly because of this issue. When will developers learn that unless the gamer is comfortable with the controls it's near impossible to enjoy a game.
Jensonjet on 24 Nov '09
Farcry 2 was dross.
WHERESMYMONKEY on 24 Nov '09
"Games shouldn't take "effort". They should be fun. Far Cry 2 was far too much work. Drive here. Kill him. Drive all the way across Africa. Oops I have Malaria. Take tablet. Kill these guys at a road block. Go to objective. Kill guy. Go back down same road. Oh the roadblock is repopulated. Get back to town. Rinse and repeat for 15 hours."

^ this Smile
4everutd on 24 Nov '09
FC2 is brilliant if you put in the effort.

Games shouldn't take "effort". They should be fun. Far Cry 2 was far too much work. Drive here. Kill him. Drive all the way across Africa. Oops I have Malaria. Take tablet. Kill these guys at a road block. Go to objective. Kill guy. Go back down same road. Oh the roadblock is repopulated. Get back to town. Rinse and repeat for 15 hours.

I 2nd that + don't forget the s**tty endings ( both sucks ) .. and did i mentioned the driving ? Fcking painful using a keyboard ....
h3r3tic666 on 24 Nov '09
FC2 is brilliant if you put in the effort.

I'm sure that smashing concrete slabs with your forehead is brilliant, but I wouldn't fancy trying it to be honest.

For me, FarCry 2 was more pain than joy. Still, I'll keep my eye on numero 3.
Mark240473 on 24 Nov '09
This has to accomplish a lot to live up to Far Cry 2. Some suggestions:

- Give the player an incurable disease again, which can debilitate you without warning at any moment. That was fun, what a fun and not completely moronic gameplay mechanic.
- Require the player to spend time digging bullets out of themselves after most fights.
- Enemies should always re-appear in previously cleared areas. Everyone loves this despite what they say.
- Make guns fail for no particular reason, especially those that fire explosives. There was nothing more fun than lining up a lovely shot with a rocket launcher only to have to bolt for your malaria-ridden life when it landed at your feet and started spinning around instead.
- Stealth should be promoted as part of the game, but enemies should be able to see you from miles away no matter how stealthy you try to be.

Finally, the Collector's Edition should include a fork which must be jammed into each eye before and after playing it. Also, some actual malaria.
GunstarHeroX on 24 Nov '09
FC2 is brilliant if you put in the effort.

agreed i liked it alot
Miss_Wacy on 24 Nov '09
FarCry 2:
Drive across lots of places that look excatly the same.

Get shot at everytime you come across someone.

Shoot back.

Gun breaks.

Die.

Someone picks you up.

Malaria kicks in.

Die of malaria.
=====================

I'd rather watch the Uwe Boll FarCry film than play FarCry 2 again. I actually requested that the person who got it for me for my birthday personally apologised to me and asked them to write a 200 word essay on why you shouldn't give people games that SUCK BALLS.

This game was spiteful.
Triffic on 24 Nov '09
lol GunstarHeroX, you hit the nail right on the head there.
Mortal Mad Matt on 24 Nov '09
Farcry 2 had a lot of potential, like Assassin's Creed 1. They nearly got it right but a few stupid errors really spoiled things.

Hopefully they fix Farcry like they did Assassin's Creed.
Nicky158 on 24 Nov '09
I hope Far Cry 3 has better controls than 2. All they need do is copy the control feel of Left4Dead, Halo or Modern Warfare. I loved the last game but gave up very quickly because of this issue. When will developers learn that unless the gamer is comfortable with the controls it's near impossible to enjoy a game.

I agree so much with this. Case in point is Resident Evil 4 on the PC. The controls sucked so much the whole game was ruined and I've been put off the series for life.
Mowds on 24 Nov '09
Here's my 10 pence....

I thought Far Cry 2 was one of the best, most imaginative FPS I have ever played. The story was superb and I always felt totally immersed in the game, story and environment. Genius. If anyone thinks otherwise it's most likely because they were too busy playing another COD or Halo to try something truly original.

Yawn. Back to bed children. Don't forget you ABC of FPS gaming book to read before bedtime. I'd hate to have a gun break on you so you actually panic one in a while. Nah, keep things nice on boring...sleep well.

Rolling EyesWink
raredevice on 24 Nov '09
Far Cry 2 is actually a very enjoyable game if you can get past the first hour. It takes roughly an hour or so to get into its groove, after that it becomes a very rewarding experiance. Much like the first time you play a metroid game, the first hour is always tough for various reasons. You should have stuck with my friend, it's still one of the few games around today that are worth their price tag...i would advise you to pick it up again now that it's cheap.
JCrawf88 on 24 Nov '09
I'll take them saying "its looking good" as credible when they admit farCry 2 was absolute horseshyte.

Worst game I've played this generation.

Immersive? I've felt more immersed sitting on a tree stump in a field on a rainy day, fishing.

I give every game I pay my hard earned money for a good run and will complete them. But after about 20% was ready to overdose.
feeg86 on 24 Nov '09
Yawn. Back to bed children. Don't forget you ABC of FPS gaming book to read before bedtime. I'd hate to have a gun break on you so you actually panic one in a while. Nah, keep things nice on boring...sleep well.

The only sleeping I did while playing this game is because it was the most boring and repetetive FPS I have ever played.

Every single mission was the same thing, it had nearly no variety. You spend too much time driving for miles through the same environments. If they take on board all the criticsm this game got, then Far Cry 3 could actualy turn out good.
Mortal Mad Matt on 24 Nov '09
Respawning enemies at check points were the biggest failure of this game, along with getting from A to B to start some of the missions, it could take 10 minutes of driving through hordes of respawning jeeps just to start a mission. And that's if your transport didn't roll over or burst into flames while you're trying to get there. Plus mulitplayer was kinda crappy. And repetition was a big problem for me.

This game had a lot of problems. It done some things well, and other things were just poorly implemented.
Nicky158 on 24 Nov '09
Well lets hope they hang an actual game off of this engine and not some sub-standard FPS that was boring (even after giving it 2-3 hours). The engine was/is incredible the game was really just bad hence why it went bargain bin in about 2-3 months. Cool
lonewolf2002 on 24 Nov '09
FC2 started off with so much potential, the fire ideas were excellent for example, but the game was so frustrating it was unplayable.
Driving for 15 minutes to a mission only to be shot and killed after the 3 guard point on the way, dying then having to start all over again, sometimes after hours of play.
Please sort it out as this REALLY ANNOYED ME and probably thousands of others.
stonyk on 24 Nov '09
I'll give it a miss if it's anything like the second game. - One of the most tedious and over-rated pieces of software i've ever had the misfortune to waste my hard-earned money on.
carterlink on 24 Nov '09
I have to say I never even finished the 2nd game. In fact after installing windows 7 I havent even touched it. It seemed pretty good for the first couple of hours but then as others have said it just got reptitive and as such boring which is a real shame.

They need to fix the game to not make everywhere look the same, not have stupid checkpoints everywhere which constantly respawn in ten minutes, more variety of vehicles and people and animals.

Create it like the open world game it should be with amazing realism based on a gta styled world with everything being so much more realistic. Also a point to note, please if you decide to do factions again at least make it so that they have effects depending who you work for.
AJB123644 on 24 Nov '09
This has to accomplish a lot to live up to Far Cry 2. Some suggestions:

- Give the player an incurable disease again, which can debilitate you without warning at any moment. That was fun, what a fun and not completely moronic gameplay mechanic.
- Require the player to spend time digging bullets out of themselves after most fights.
- Enemies should always re-appear in previously cleared areas. Everyone loves this despite what they say.
- Make guns fail for no particular reason, especially those that fire explosives. There was nothing more fun than lining up a lovely shot with a rocket launcher only to have to bolt for your malaria-ridden life when it landed at your feet and started spinning around instead.
- Stealth should be promoted as part of the game, but enemies should be able to see you from miles away no matter how stealthy you try to be.

Finally, the Collector's Edition should include a fork which must be jammed into each eye before and after playing it. Also, some actual malaria.

Laughing

I had this game pre-ordered but canceled it after discovering it came with SecuROM of a similar vein to what was on "ME" at the time. Based upon the follow-up reviews and comments it seems I may not have missed out on too much. Ah well, it did look good though I do think the malaria idea is crap considering you can take medication that treats it in two weeks or less. Now if it was ebola... Razz
The_KFD_Case on 24 Nov '09
I loved the original Far Cry, but there was just something that bugged me whilst trying to play Far Cry2. The way you moved your character around and the general 'feel' of the game just felt completley awful to me. I havent even bothered to get much further than the first handfull of missions up to after getting the malaria medicine. There was just nothing to really grab me and make me want to keep playing. Annoyingly having to traverse from one side of the map to another just to do a 'kill everything and everyone' mission just annoyed me. Also I dont know if it was me but enemeies felt like they ate bullets for breakfast.
Typheous on 24 Nov '09
"Hopefully they fix Farcry like they did Assassin's Creed."
That's exactly what was about to say. Far Cry 2 had so much potential. That, and it was GORGEOUS.
The haters are exaggeratinga bit though, it's a flawed good game. Not a piece of s**t.
dahsif on 24 Nov '09
Personally I thought FC2 was great - the graphics are excellent, the story and setting were quite original and I never had a problem with the controls. I wonder how many people who didn't like it were playing on consoles? Of course it wasn't perfect, but that just means FC3 is an opportunity to improve on something that was already good to begin with.
MrStillwater on 24 Nov '09
Can't believe all the negative comments Far Cry 2 is getting. I thought that game was amazing. One of the most immersive games I've ever played. It had its flaws but I found it so much more interesting than a lot of other shooters.

I might be alone but I for one can't wait for Far Cry 3.
Loz01 on 24 Nov '09
We all have different tastes but to say FarCry was a poor game is ridiculous, just as it would be for me to say it about Halo which wasnt't my cup of tea.

I agree with Loz01 and MrStillwater, i thought the game was great and really made you think about how to go about your goals if you played it on the highest difficulty. The respawning AI was its only downpoint from my point of view. I liked the driving, you guys do realise it was set in Africa hence the not so populated landscape? Then again i guess some people just want all the games set in the same grey place it seems.

As for those complaining about driving from oneside of the vast map to the other, why didn't you simply use the coaches? they transported you instantly from one side of the map to the other and meant that the the goal was never more than a couple of minutes drive away.
Adam81uk on 24 Nov '09
I really enjoyed farcry 2 myself, but yeah i can see why it frustrated people. Didn't really bother me. I did find it amusing how a lot of people i've seen talking about the game drove everywhere and didn't realise you could get a bus Laughing

Keen to see how far cry 3 turns out! hope there isn't an Antarctic setting =/ why do sequels seem to be going Antarctic when they run out of ideas?
Malmo on 24 Nov '09
I liked the driving, you guys do realise it was set in Africa hence the not so populated landscape? Then again i guess some people just want all the games set in the same grey place it seems.

I understand that it would be as populated as othr games in city and western type environments but it would have been nice to have had more than just soldiers running rampant after you. Even in those types of war situations not all the civilians leave which I felt was a downside because places which should have been bustling with life, for example the ceasefire zones, had no atmosphere.
AJB123644 on 24 Nov '09
I actually played thru' FC2 on my PC, and while there were lots of stuff to enjoy, the terrain was never open, as it was in FC1 (probably "Dumbed down for Console™" as everything is these days.

I greatly enjoyed picking off long range targets with the bolt-action sniper. There was much to love about combat in particular.

The level(s) however, were dreadful - none of the "approach as you will" from the first one. You had two options and were appropriately funnelled towards trouble. Not bad compared to many other games - just bad compared to FC1.

The repetitiveness was by far the worst. Oh my #!#! the constant driving around, it felt like stuff was thrown in deliberately just to end up with more hours of gameplay, instead of a shorter game that was really enjoyable. I can understand why "20 hours of gameplay" on the box sounds better than "It's Modern Warfare - don't sneeze, you'll miss it!" - but still. We expected more, and we had the right to, based on the first game.

What ever happened to the "epic conflict" between two sides? If you worked for faction A, you NEVER met someone from faction B - every single person you met was an enemy. Roadblocks that repopulate faster than I can finish a cigarette!?

What killed FC2 and made it such a pain (punctuated by moments of sheer joy) was the complete lack of "suspension of disbelief" - it didn't feel "real". Even the weird goings on in FC1 didn't feel "not realistic" - they were Aliens and all, but - believably so. FC2 created a sterile and un-living world for us to play in. That's fine for the console kiddies that have been brought up to believe Halo is actually a good game - but for the PC user, used to FC1, Flashpoint, and so on - it's just not cutting the mustard.

The best way to hype FC3 would be to say "We're sorry, we've shot the guys who made the decisions for FC2!" - that, or "We'll make a PC-version first, give you that, and then ruin it enough so it'll fit on the consoles".

Oh how I enjoy console gaming, but oh how I hate what the consoles are doing to games. So few ambitious releases now are actually using the PC, because they have to fit the games onto consoles.
the688 on 24 Nov '09
Can't believe all the negative comments Far Cry 2 is getting. I thought that game was amazing. One of the most immersive games I've ever played. It had its flaws but I found it so much more interesting than a lot of other shooters.

I might be alone but I for one can't wait for Far Cry 3.

You are not alone. I for one am keen on seeing what Ubisoft can conjure up with "Far Cry 3". I just hope they don't gimp it with DRM for the PC and incorporate feedback in the manner they appear to have done with "AC2".
The_KFD_Case on 24 Nov '09
One thing that really ruined it for me were the respawning checkpoints. I can understand if you go back the next day, but a few minutes later and they were all freshly staffed with guards again. Sometimes you wern't even out of sight and they would respawn.

The other thing that really annoyed me was the way you would be chased by guards. It was the same pattern every single time. Drive past a checkpoint not bothering to stop, get chased by jeep with two guards in. Eventually after them following you across the entire map you would get fed up and stop to deal with them. They would stop, one would get out and the other would shoot you from the gatling gun on the roof. I mean, they could have put a bit more intelligence in their A.I for gods sake! Also, even if you were crounching in the grass with the stealth suit enemies would still see you a mile off before you even knew where they were.

Can't believe these issues were never patched, especially the respawning. The atmosphere is really great though I must admit. It really does feel like you're walking around in Africa. Lets hope the sequel is a lot better because I had really high hopes for this game and was let down in a big way.
sonic_uk on 24 Nov '09
Yeah the respawning checkpoints and a Hilux-patrol in every darn part of the road is what killed the game for me, too.

And the game was basically a maze of roads. Didn't have a sense of adventure, at all. Just endless swarms of enemies that respawned immediately you got out of draw distance.

And the save game system was a pain in consoles. Why oh why can't console games have just a normal "save whenever you please" system?!
jukkiz on 25 Nov '09
The long moving from point to point was boring but everything eles was great.

I hope 3 wont have monsters like 1 becouse it basicly ruined the game.
jus123 on 25 Nov '09
This has to accomplish a lot to live up to Far Cry 2. Some suggestions:

- Give the player an incurable disease again, which can debilitate you without warning at any moment. That was fun, what a fun and not completely moronic gameplay mechanic.
- Require the player to spend time digging bullets out of themselves after most fights.
- Enemies should always re-appear in previously cleared areas. Everyone loves this despite what they say.
- Make guns fail for no particular reason, especially those that fire explosives. There was nothing more fun than lining up a lovely shot with a rocket launcher only to have to bolt for your malaria-ridden life when it landed at your feet and started spinning around instead.
- Stealth should be promoted as part of the game, but enemies should be able to see you from miles away no matter how stealthy you try to be.

Finally, the Collector's Edition should include a fork which must be jammed into each eye before and after playing it. Also, some actual malaria.

You bunch of ungrateful bast**ds. I'm sure the developers would like to apologise personally to each of you who despise their products for spending a couple of years and millions developing them for you. If you don't like it, don't play it.
gravyboy on 25 Nov '09
This has to accomplish a lot to live up to Far Cry 2. Some suggestions:

- Give the player an incurable disease again, which can debilitate you without warning at any moment. That was fun, what a fun and not completely moronic gameplay mechanic.
- Require the player to spend time digging bullets out of themselves after most fights.
- Enemies should always re-appear in previously cleared areas. Everyone loves this despite what they say.
- Make guns fail for no particular reason, especially those that fire explosives. There was nothing more fun than lining up a lovely shot with a rocket launcher only to have to bolt for your malaria-ridden life when it landed at your feet and started spinning around instead.
- Stealth should be promoted as part of the game, but enemies should be able to see you from miles away no matter how stealthy you try to be.

Finally, the Collector's Edition should include a fork which must be jammed into each eye before and after playing it. Also, some actual malaria.

You bunch of ungrateful bast**ds. I'm sure the developers would like to apologise personally to each of you who despise their products for spending a couple of years and millions developing them for you. If you don't like it, don't play it.

Ooh great. When they're doing that, could they send me some cash as well? Razz
Random Hangman on 25 Nov '09
You can't please everyone. People say they don't want easy, casual, set-piece heavy games so when a hard, hardcore and very open FPS comes around everyone moans that it's not casual enough.

Stealth worked if you waited until night, you could take out a whole base with the silenced sniper rifle and silenced smg without anyone knowing. The driving to and fro? That's half of GTA and it was a good way to show off the beautiful environment they created. Not to mention you could just get the buses, which save when you get on them too.
CrispyLog on 25 Nov '09
This has to accomplish a lot to live up to Far Cry 2. Some suggestions:

- Give the player an incurable disease again, which can debilitate you without warning at any moment. That was fun, what a fun and not completely moronic gameplay mechanic.
- Require the player to spend time digging bullets out of themselves after most fights.
- Enemies should always re-appear in previously cleared areas. Everyone loves this despite what they say.
- Make guns fail for no particular reason, especially those that fire explosives. There was nothing more fun than lining up a lovely shot with a rocket launcher only to have to bolt for your malaria-ridden life when it landed at your feet and started spinning around instead.
- Stealth should be promoted as part of the game, but enemies should be able to see you from miles away no matter how stealthy you try to be.

Finally, the Collector's Edition should include a fork which must be jammed into each eye before and after playing it. Also, some actual malaria.

You bunch of ungrateful bast**ds. I'm sure the developers would like to apologise personally to each of you who despise their products for spending a couple of years and millions developing them for you. If you don't like it, don't play it.

Yeah, because I'm sure they did it solely out of the goodness of their hearts. Oh wait. You still had to pay for this game, did you not? Rolling Eyes
The_KFD_Case on 25 Nov '09
I put about 10 hours into Far Cry 2 because it was one of the first games I bought on my PS3 and I had lack of options. It was rubbish whatever way you looked at it and had no relation to the first quality game.
VirtualCrack on 25 Nov '09
Yeah, because I'm sure they did it solely out of the goodness of their hearts. Oh wait. You still had to pay for this game, did you not? Rolling Eyes

Absolutely. I feel that people who b*tch and moan when it comes to free DLC are ungrateful b*astards, but when you pay £40 for a game and don't enjoy it you have all the right in the world to say so! Bring back GAME's 10 day return policy, I say!
Random Hangman on 25 Nov '09
I would not even consider buying if they don't include a server version right away..we waited for year or more for the farcry2 server and still have crap support/info on it.
thebobzilla on 25 Nov '09
Well I like many thought the concept of FC2 was good. Unfortunately for me it fell down as a game when they failed to improve on the wonky AI. A lot of hype before release was that you were able to silently aproach targets/missions in different ways. What a load of pap, I tried doing one mission sneaking in the dark several times from several angles and ended up in exactly the same firefight everytime. Boring. At least the firsy far cry was fun inspite of it's wonky AI. Far cry 2 took away the fun and left us with nothing.
laslowoodbine on 25 Nov '09
Far Cry 2 was a game that I wanted to like, but just couldn't... Assassinating people is always fun in games, unless you have to drive across Africa and kill 100 people at roadblocks just to get to your target each time.

Oh, and I love the way they gave the host the ability to remove people from Ranked games, so whenever the host wasn't at the top of the game he could just kick everyone above him. That was bloody priceless, trolling my way through multiple games getting owned by fagott grenade launchers, to finally get the game where your doing well only to be kicked by some little gimp who's only hosted the game so he can rig it.
flameswordsman on 25 Nov '09
was all geared up for far cry 2... till i played it.

god that game was shit.


^this
eastldn on 25 Nov '09
FC2 was great, except for the game breaking bugs. AND the fact that it took Ubisoft 7 months to patch it. AND that the patch only fixed new game saves, so someone like me with 35 hours of progress was stuck because of a bug. Ubisoft was so F'ed to not fix the problem right away.

PLEASE DON'T BUY FC3...
HoRNS456 on 25 Nov '09
hope it's (WAY) more exciting than 2 was.
Sleepaphobic on 25 Nov '09
This has to accomplish a lot to live up to Far Cry 2. Some suggestions:

- Give the player an incurable disease again, which can debilitate you without warning at any moment. That was fun, what a fun and not completely moronic gameplay mechanic.
- Require the player to spend time digging bullets out of themselves after most fights.
- Enemies should always re-appear in previously cleared areas. Everyone loves this despite what they say.
- Make guns fail for no particular reason, especially those that fire explosives. There was nothing more fun than lining up a lovely shot with a rocket launcher only to have to bolt for your malaria-ridden life when it landed at your feet and started spinning around instead.
- Stealth should be promoted as part of the game, but enemies should be able to see you from miles away no matter how stealthy you try to be.

Finally, the Collector's Edition should include a fork which must be jammed into each eye before and after playing it. Also, some actual malaria.

You bunch of ungrateful bast**ds. I'm sure the developers would like to apologise personally to each of you who despise their products for spending a couple of years and millions developing them for you. If you don't like it, don't play it.

So you must love every game ever developed then? Not one game you found boring or a game mechanic you did not like after purchasing it? Rolling EyesRolling EyesRolling Eyes
lonewolf2002 on 25 Nov '09
FC2 is brilliant if you put in the effort.

Games shouldn't take "effort"...

Sorry, but I couldn't disagree more. It's this mentality that's lead to easy as sin games, that are just an exercise in going through the motions rather than any amount of challenge in them.

There is nothing wrong with having to put some effort into playing game. Sure, it shouldn't be a labourious grind-fest either, but neither do I want it a barely interactive movie, that has me as mainly a spectator that has to 'Press A' at appropriate times.
_Marty_ on 25 Nov '09
Farcry 2 'looked' exciting too, but 2 minutes into the game everyone knew it was pants.

Is it really a surprise to hear someone involved with the game is stating that it 'looks exciting'?
Paradaz - UK on 25 Nov '09
FC2 wasn't bad, the problem was that because the enemies respawned it took you ages to get from one place to the other and you often ended up half dead before you even got to your next mission. And the AI was really dumb close-up but an amazing shot from half a mile away.

It would've been far better if each firefight was longer and harder, but you only needed to clear the camp once. Or a fight between the factions so that if allies controlled an outpost you could just drive through, but if the enemy held it at least you had some friendly guns to help you.

In terms of being really atmospheric and utterly beautiful to look at, FC2 was spot on. The story was alright and the voice acting was good. It was in-character all the way and sometimes you could start to care about your rescue buddies. If FC3 can fix those issues I'll be interested.
Dajmin on 26 Nov '09
@raredevice

Dude if you thought the "Story" in FC2 was that great then...Honestly...I can't even come up with an insult degrading enough Razz

There was no story although the voice acting was pretty good sometimes.

FC2 = This

Long Taxi bored by some bloke who don't know how to shut the F* up (much like real cabbys Razz) in which you pass out from the Malaria then wake up with a pervert reading your diary and playing with a knife...In which you pass out mid gunfight get pulled into a bunch of crap that doesn't concern you because you have malaria whilst trying to hunt said pervert down and cut his hobnob off...

All this whilst - no F* it I can't go on Spaceballs was better than this and more humorous mate...The only story slightly worse than this game would be....Magicland Dizzy (Amstrad CPC 464) I mean...And EGG that WALKS?! AND TALKS?! (Ok it may be a spell but that brings in WITCHES!!!??? And yes this was a joke I prefer Dizzy's story over FC2)
Zedfragg on 27 Nov '09
For me the woefully immersion-busting respawns and a bit of idiotic AI here and there were the only problems (but some good AI here and there also to be fair).
I got around the respawning soldier problem by, er, going around them, unless of course i wanted an ammo or syringe top-up. There`s the already mentioned bus service, rivers were normally pretty unpopulated if you took the time to remember where the moored boats were and about half of the time i just went off-road and drove around the checkpoints.
Maybe its because i`m an old git with a WASD claw for a hand but i found the driving pretty easy although it would have been much better to be able to "drive-by" shoot or at least have an option of which side to get out of after a chase (i found a hand-brake turn right in front of the chaser very effective but ultimately a repetitive chore).
There`s been so much bile about the respawning issue that it would make no business sense for it not to be addressed in FC3, i personally am giddy with anticipation as i found FC2 an overall exciting and beautiful game. Now FC2 with the depth of Fallout 3, that would be a wonderful thing.
mickythefish on 28 Nov '09
I always like to think I have a fertile imagination and am never one of these people who struggles to amuse themselves in a huge open world, in fact I have always loved the sensation of standing at the top of a wind swept mountain or rain hit sky scraper and thinking " right.. what can I do next" it is the underlying attraction to me of games like fallout,oblivion,crackdown,gta,fable, etc etc etc

But I totally fail to understand how Far cry 3 can look pretty exciting as when I played the 2nd instalment I got bored, tired depressed and fatigued just playing the game, and I have a high tolerance level for crap games- see Lego Indiana,kung fu Panda-jericho....

will give far cry 3 a bit fat chubby side swerve me thinks Rolling Eyes
ewko117 on 1 Dec '09
I did like Far Cry 2 personally, but it did have its flaws. They needed to be more creative with the missions, and make lots of different types of objective. It would be nice if everyone didn't shoot you on sight, and only shot at you if provoked, or if you entered certain restricted bases. Also isn't it supposed to be a war between the factions? So how come its just everybody shooting at you, there should be fights between the different factions. Guard posts should remain empty for a couple of game days, and bodies should remain for a day, and if you empty a guard post or base several times, it should become completely abandoned, although you do still want there to be enmies to shoot.
grindcore1993 on 31 Dec '09
All of you who say farcry 2 was boring must have quit playing after the first 2 hours. Missions in this game get crazy after the first two hours, and this is personally my favorite game of 08. This game is 10 times as immersive as halo, has the biggest and most polished open world ive ever played, and it does not direct you at all, it lets you go about doing anything you want however you want. It is the most realistic game ive ever played, i realized that when i was standing in tall grass, i shot an rpg, and the grass behind me caught on fire. Oh, and there are such things as trains in the game for whoever said it takes to long to travel.
bubbabvi on 4 Mar '10
All of you who say farcry 2 was boring must have quit playing after the first 2 hours. Missions in this game get crazy after the first two hours, and this is personally my favorite game of 08. This game is 10 times as immersive as halo, has the biggest and most polished open world ive ever played, and it does not direct you at all, it lets you go about doing anything you want however you want. It is the most realistic game ive ever played, i realized that when i was standing in tall grass, i shot an rpg, and the grass behind me caught on fire. Oh, and there are such things as trains in the game for whoever said it takes to long to travel.
bubbabvi on 4 Mar '10
Wow, I can't believe some of the comments here about how bad Fry Cry 2 is. I have played a lot of games in my days and this has to be in my top ten games. I think some of these "cry babies" want to play games where everything is handed to them on a platter. Like Left4dead where all you do is go around killing zombie after zombie, after zombie aftezzzzzzzz. To be honest I just played the first few minutes of l4d but that had to be the most boring few minutes of my gaming life.

I think it's great that they throw a few wrenches in the works while playing FC2. It makes it like life where everything goes wrong at the worst possible time. Where guard post do get restocked with guards after having the place cleaned out. Yeah, there were some spots that were a little trying at times, like the driving, but like some said you always had the option of the bus. And the ending wasn't totally what I would have had it be, but I think it left it kind of opened ended as to whether or not either person really died in the end.

Okay well I am off my soapbox just had to throw in my two cents worth.

Peace to one and all,
Midnightflash345
midnightflash345 on 20 Mar '10
Wow.Why don't people have more love/respect for FC2. The game was amazing and I guarantee you have never played anything like it. The Stalker series comes pretty close though I suppose.

The only real problem with the game was the respawn of guards/outposts. Finding a way to fix this would have cured much of the frustration you see here. Driving back and forth wouldn't be as grueling as it sometimes felt if you just had to battle one way. That said, it really wasn't hard to get through an outpost FAST if you really wanted. You can usually just drive through and then pullover to nade or rocket any vehicles following you. Or you could blow up their vehicles from afar so they cant follow you when you drive by... or just level the whole outpost for that matter. You had tons of options... and that was the point. Just be creative.

-improvements-

Add MORE guns. I love that I was forced into using different configurations of guns that took me out of my comfort zone. You learned to become proficient with all sorts of things that you thought sucked initially. and for those people that hate the inaccuracy of the rifles... duly noted, but what do your groupings look like at 100m through iron sights from a standing position?

Fix the shotguns. Why do games so thoroughly ruin shotties? The spread is always ridiculous and random. disregarding choke, you will certainly be able to put every pellet of 00 in someones torso at 25m. even at 50m it should still be reasonable lethal. But not in this game. Also... a deer slug option would be nice. it's simple to put that ounce+ of lead on target at 50m.

Don't mark the safe houses on the map... let them be a reward for exploring. I think the little campsites should act like lesser safehouses, allowing you sleep and replenish a lesser amount of ammo perhaps.

Make map exploration more fruitful. more crap to find at all the rich little getaways I come across in undisturbed parts of the map. for example, make it so some guns are unlocked when you find them in special gun cases hidden on the map. new contacts for side missions could be scattered around as well. also, make those hard to get diamond cases 10-15 diamonds worth of rewarding.

Adding civilians with the hardware we have now shouldn't be too hard. It would be fun to watch them scatter when the gunfire broke out. You could also make them parts of random scripted events at the roadside (getting their vehicles searched by faction members or something). I wouldn't mind seeing foot patrols as well.

Make healing harder. Make the syrettes give temporary health that slowly fades. I would like it more if you had to withdraw to give real first aid or heal rather than instantly getting health back. first aid packs could be a separate item all together!

This game was amazing. I think that people are made because it's too close to how inconvenient real life can be. If the game were much more realistic, all the people used to being spoonfed action by their usual FPS games would not even be able to comprehend it.
totenkopf on 21 Mar '10
almost everyone gives farcry2 a bad review and farcry 1 which was much better ever wonder why this was? well let me tell you farcry 1 was made by crytek makers of crysis which is an awesome game. Ubisoft then asked for rights to farcry and its engine which they modded into Dunia. That is the only reason i can come up with for the extreme difference in gameplay.
Serpentkill on 26 Mar '10
well i think that its a pretty fun game, i like the fact you really gotta do WORK to earn new guns. sure its a tad repetitive buts its still fun, and takin the good ole jeep offroading= ROFLFUN
silvermane18 on 8 Apr '10
Ow my HAT all you guys are smoking something but 1 or 2 guys actually i agree with them....
I live is Africa and man this is awesome ya to americans and other people over the world mite say ya its looks the same but wow you guys are small minded, the Gfx was awesome, and thats what really happens in Africa by the way..... you dont have plans or trains lol, you have to drive so i say 10/10 awesome, and all the internationals i would say come look here how Africa looks before replying cause you dont know what you talking about lol ( everything looks the same) Fail...
Python.ZA on 20 May '10
Wow.Why don't people have more love/respect for FC2. The game was amazing and I guarantee you have never played anything like it. The Stalker series comes pretty close though I suppose.

The only real problem with the game was the respawn of guards/outposts. Finding a way to fix this would have cured much of the frustration you see here. Driving back and forth wouldn't be as grueling as it sometimes felt if you just had to battle one way. That said, it really wasn't hard to get through an outpost FAST if you really wanted. You can usually just drive through and then pullover to nade or rocket any vehicles following you. Or you could blow up their vehicles from afar so they cant follow you when you drive by... or just level the whole outpost for that matter. You had tons of options... and that was the point. Just be creative.

-improvements-

Add MORE guns. I love that I was forced into using different configurations of guns that took me out of my comfort zone. You learned to become proficient with all sorts of things that you thought sucked initially. and for those people that hate the inaccuracy of the rifles... duly noted, but what do your groupings look like at 100m through iron sights from a standing position?

Fix the shotguns. Why do games so thoroughly ruin shotties? The spread is always ridiculous and random. disregarding choke, you will certainly be able to put every pellet of 00 in someones torso at 25m. even at 50m it should still be reasonable lethal. But not in this game. Also... a deer slug option would be nice. it's simple to put that ounce+ of lead on target at 50m.

Don't mark the safe houses on the map... let them be a reward for exploring. I think the little campsites should act like lesser safehouses, allowing you sleep and replenish a lesser amount of ammo perhaps.

Make map exploration more fruitful. more crap to find at all the rich little getaways I come across in undisturbed parts of the map. for example, make it so some guns are unlocked when you find them in special gun cases hidden on the map. new contacts for side missions could be scattered around as well. also, make those hard to get diamond cases 10-15 diamonds worth of rewarding.

Adding civilians with the hardware we have now shouldn't be too hard. It would be fun to watch them scatter when the gunfire broke out. You could also make them parts of random scripted events at the roadside (getting their vehicles searched by faction members or something). I wouldn't mind seeing foot patrols as well.

Make healing harder. Make the syrettes give temporary health that slowly fades. I would like it more if you had to withdraw to give real first aid or heal rather than instantly getting health back. first aid packs could be a separate item all together!

This game was amazing. I think that people are made because it's too close to how inconvenient real life can be. If the game were much more realistic, all the people used to being spoonfed action by their usual FPS games would not even be able to comprehend it.
man i so agree with you everyone is like wow FC2 was so boring and they like why must i drive so far its a fact they were out of there playing zone* i loved this game for a person who played games there hole life* home schooled* its a fact this is one of the best games ive played ( but im not FPS im a racing person) but still this is one of teh ebst FPS ive played i agree there could add more stuff but it was still awesome...
Python.ZA on 20 May '10
I think far cry 2 is one of the best games ever.

Must be a bunch of 10 year olds complaining.

Some improvements I would like to see:

1. Have a Mountain climbing kit available for purchase at the weapons shop, to allow climbing of all mountains and heights.

2. Have a buddy mission, that when complete, allows your buddy to ride shot gun in the assault truck, or allows your buddy to drive while you mount the gun.

3. Have a weapons upgrade at the weapons shop that would allow you to pick any 3 weapons of your choice.l
kulgion on 20 May '10
All of you shut the f%#$ up because FC2 was the s**t Online was the best of all the games at the time. Yeah maybe the story mode was crappy but the games was meant for you to make it interesting you were the one that suppost to make the game good. Because you could play how ever you wanted. I hope FC3 comes out this year I cant wait. shout out to my FC2 team >Trained f**king Killers (TFK). LaughingLaughingLaughingLaughing
M1CH0ACAN0 on 28 May '10
Im right there with my fellow TFK M1CHOACANO. Far Cry 2 is the s**t. Nothing like the s**t shooters like Modern Warfare. It actually takes some talent to shoot someone in the head. Not just point spray and kill like the lame ass Call of Duty series. Don't hate if you logged on FC2 and got your ass beat down. Also what game out there can you design a playable map and play online. That was one of the best attributes about the game. Far Cry three will be the s**t, and all of you that can't do nothing but point and spray to kill go play COD!!!!!! TFK will be running FC3 just as we did on FC2!
CHEF MURDA on 28 Jun '10
All you people saying that Farcry 2 sucked, shut up. If you don't like it sell it or something, theres absolutely no point going on a forum dedicated to a game and saying how freakin horrible it was. And if you think its repetitive, do different missions, and always subvert the main ones. The only problem I had with the game was the aiming and i didn't like the malaria. The graphics were freaking amazing, i loved the african setting. I was excited to be able to kill wild animals, but that kind of sucked, theres no danger and the animals don't even bleed. Also they should add like a helicopter or airplane so you can get to places without a nearby bus station without having to stop every five seconds to kill some a-hole who decides to shoot at you for no reason.
bv13 on 12 Jul '10
Read all 69 commentsPost a Comment
// Related Content
Reviews:
Previews:
Interviews:
News:
More Related
Far Cry 2from £7.00
AsdaNo Information£7.00
PriceMinister UKIn Stock£7.99
Cool Shop UKIn Stock£8.80
// The Best ofCVG
Get FREE games at FileRadar.
News | Reviews | Previews | Features | Interviews | Cheats | Hardware | Forums | Competitions | Blogs
Top Games: PES 2011 | BioShock: Infinite | Deus Ex: Human Revolution | Assassin's Creed Brotherhood | Call Of Duty: Black Ops | FIFA 11
Zelda: Skyward Sword | Portal 2 | Dead Space 2 | Killzone 3 | Halo Reach
Top Reviews: PlayStation Move | Metroid: Other M | Mafia 2 | Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days | Lara Croft And The Guardian Of Light | Deathspank
StarCraft 2 | Doom 2 | Dragon Quest IX | 250GB Xbox 360 Slim | Crackdown 2
Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited,
Beauford Court, 30 Monmouth Street, Bath, UK BA1 2BW
England and Wales company registration number 2008885